Extending the Vick discussion

Obviously, the federal indictment of Michael Vick produced strong reactions from folks on both sides of the issue.
If you read my column on the front page of this morning's Ledger-Enquirer, you know where I stand.
Some readers have raised the question of whether it's fair for the NFL or the Falcons to punish Vick before he even goes to trial. Some ESPN talking heads were flapping their gums about the NFL player conduct policy, saying there's no precedent or provision for league commissioner Roger Goodell to suspend a player on the basis of one indictment.
Actually, there is.
The NFL Players Association signed off on a basic agreement that gives Goodell carte blanche to impose penalties against players who run afoul of the law and/or league rules. When or if there’s an appeal of league-imposed discipline, guess what? Goodell gets to determine the outcome of it. He’s judge and jury.
NFLPA president Gene Upshaw hasn’t raised a stink about Goodell’s handling of Pacman Jones, Tank Johnson or Chris Henry. There are plenty of players on the team, and probably a significant number in Vick's locker room, who are tired of having their collective reputations soiled by the actions of a few.
The Vick apologists in their No. 7 replica jerseys have occasionally laid the race card on the table as the reason for the indictment and extensive news coverage it has received. That's a fallacy. Atlanta defensive tackle Jonathan Babineaux, who is black, was arrested for allegedly killing his girlfriend's dog last winter and the story received little play in the press.
This is about celebrity to some degree. Vick has a $130 million contract and he plays quarterback. The Falcons have wagered their future on him. Their corporate identity, their brand, is synonymous with Michael Vick.
Being linked to a dogfighting investigation, to gambling and a criminal conspiracy, put Vick in a kettle of hot soup.
Being named in an indictment put Vick, the Falcons and the NFL in front of a blast furnace. The trio could get scalded worse than those Nazis who stupidly opened the Lost Ark in that Indiana Jones movie.
Vick blamed family for his troubles a few months ago. He met with Goodell in April and promised to keep his nose clean.
‘‘It’s unfortunate I have to take the heat. Lesson learned for me,’’ he said then.
Uh, not so much. According to the indictment, he killed underperforming fighting dogs by hanging, shooting or slamming them that same month.
The outrage over such senseless destruction isn’t defined by racial boundaries. On Wednesday, the mostly-white People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the Rev. Al Sharpton and hip-hop music impressario Russell Simmons released a joint statement condemning animal abuse and expressing hope that Vick and the three others named in the indictment will be punished if found guilty.
The Falcons can -- and should -- take pre-emptive action. As I wrote today, they would spare themselves much embarrassment by releasing him. They wouldn't necessarily lose much on the field as a result. Vick is 15-16 as a starter the last two seasons.
If you think my proposal is too harsh, pretend you're a business owner.
Let's say you have an employee who has made a series of irresponsible but not necessarily illegal choices that have embarrassed the company. You've told him to straighten up.
Suddenly, you learn that this employee, in charge of a $130 million account for your firm, is under federal indictment.
Would he or she still have a job tomorrow?